首页> 外文OA文献 >Are voters, consumers? A qualitative exploration of the voter-consumer analogy in political marketing
【2h】

Are voters, consumers? A qualitative exploration of the voter-consumer analogy in political marketing

机译:选民是消费者吗?对政治营销中选民-消费者类比的定性探索

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Scholars from a wide range of backgrounds have compared political and commercial marketing and advertising. Some have argued that the differences between these two spheres are relatively slight, others that they are fundamental. In this paper we attempt to problematize, deepen and add nuance to the voting-consumption analogy drawing on a range of literature in the political marketing and brand marketing fields. In order to add an empirical perspective to the discussion we draw on tentative findings from a small-scale exploratory case study of voting attitudes. The responses of eight focus groups of British voters to two well-known Labour Party election broadcasts were interpreted using theoretical concepts from brand marketing and also from cultural studies of political marketing. In conclusion, we argue that there may be aspects of audience response to political advertising that are incompatible with brand marketing theory. ‘Voters’ and ‘consumers’ do seem to share some resemblance in their affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to advertising, which is perhaps unsurprising, since political parties and commercial entities do sometimes employ similar marketing techniques. However, in this study these voters displayed certain responses that differentiated them strongly from consumers. This implies that the analogy between commercial and political marketing has its limitations. We conclude by suggesting that the voter-consumer analogy is highly plausible when viewed on a macro-level but becomes weaker as research focuses in on a micro-level analysis of the individual within the voting context.
机译:来自不同背景的学者比较了政治和商业营销与广告。有些人认为这两个领域之间的差异相对较小,另一些人则认为它们是根本的。在本文中,我们尝试在政治营销和品牌营销领域的一系列文献中对投票消费类比进行质疑,加深和细化。为了在讨论中增加经验视角,我们借鉴了投票态度的小型探索性案例研究中的初步发现。英国选民的八个焦点小组对两次著名的工党选举广播的回应都使用了品牌营销以及政治营销的文化研究中的理论概念进行了解释。总之,我们认为,受众对政治广告的反应可能与品牌营销理论不符。 “投票人”和“消费者”在广告的情感,认知和行为反应上似乎确实有些相似,这也许不足为奇,因为政党和商业实体有时确实采用类似的营销技巧。但是,在这项研究中,这些选民表现出某些反应,使他们与消费者有很大区别。这意味着商业和政治营销之间的类比有其局限性。我们的结论是,从宏观角度看,选民与消费者的类比是高度合理的,但随着研究的重点是在投票环境中对个人进行微观层面的分析,选民与消费者的类比就显得微不足道了。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peng, Norman; Hackley, Chris;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号